Innovator: Novelty Is the Engine

The innovator style’s engine is novelty: it gets more excited imagining different ways of doing things than perfecting what already exists.

Important note: this article describes a personality trait around creativity and novelty, not financial or business advice. It doesn’t replace a qualified advisor’s judgment on any real money or business decision.

Innovativeness as its own dimension

Research on entrepreneurial orientation, developed by authors like Jeffrey Covin and Dennis Slevin, describes innovativeness as a dimension independent of proactiveness or risk-taking: you can be very innovative without being especially bold, or the reverse. The innovator style stands out precisely on that dimension: what drives it isn’t so much executing fast or taking on risk as a rule, but creative dissatisfaction with what already exists and a constant search for a different way of doing it.

How it shows up day to day

• Gets bored perfecting something that already works well; prefers reinventing it.
• Generates ideas easily, sometimes faster than it can develop them.
• Habitually questions the “it’s always been done this way.”
• Gets more excited by the creative process than by repetition, even when repetition is profitable.

Their growth challenge

The same idea-generating strength that defines this profile can turn into scatter if it isn’t paired with execution capacity. The challenge isn’t generating fewer new ideas, it’s learning to filter which ones deserve to become something real and sustaining the effort needed to carry them out, instead of jumping to the next idea as soon as it appears.

Zero to one: the difference between copying and creating

Peter Thiel, in Zero to One (2014), distinguishes two forms of progress. One is horizontal: taking something that already works and repeating it, going from one unit to many. The other is vertical: doing something that didn’t exist before, going from zero to one. For Thiel, most businesses operate in the first territory, copying a proven model and competing on execution. The innovator style is, almost by definition, the one drawn to the second.

Thiel also proposes a question he uses to evaluate ideas and founders: what important truth do very few people agree with you on? He isn’t looking for a provocative opinion for its own sake, he’s looking for a conviction grounded in something others haven’t seen yet. It’s a way, according to Thiel, of telling real innovation apart from mere novelty: it isn’t enough to do something different, that difference has to respond to something true that the rest of the market hasn’t understood yet. This is a description of one author’s argument, not an investment recommendation: any real decision about which idea to pursue should be made with specific information and, if needed, a qualified advisor’s judgment.

Complementary to other styles

The innovator style pairs well with the proactive doer, who supplies exactly the fast execution it sometimes lacks. The cautious strategist offers the planning counterpoint that can filter its ideas before launching them.

Want to see your own style? Take the entrepreneurial style quiz.