Inspirational Leader: you lead through shared vision and example
You lead through shared vision and example: you want your team to grow and feel part of something meaningful, beyond just getting tasks done.
You’re not satisfied with things simply getting done: you care that whoever does them understands why it’s worth doing.
From transactional to transformational leadership
Historian and political scientist James MacGregor Burns introduced the concept of transformational leadership in 1978, which psychologist Bernard Bass later developed within organizational research: a leadership style that mobilizes people by appealing to values, purpose, and personal example, in contrast to transactional leadership, centered on clear exchanges of effort for reward. This profile’s inspirational leadership fits that model: the driving force isn’t compliance with rules, but a shared sense of where things are headed.
How this style shows up
- The “why” behind tasks gets communicated often, not just the “what” that needs doing.
- Personal example carries as much weight as instructions: leading by your own behavior, not just your words.
- The team tends to feel part of something bigger, not just executing isolated assignments.
- Time gets invested in people’s development, not just in the immediate delivery of results.
When the vision needs structure
This style’s risk is that the vision stays just talk without a minimal structure to hold it up: clear goals, concrete deadlines, regular follow-up. Combining inspiration with some of the order that organizing leadership brings, without losing sight of the underlying vision, is an approach that works well in some cases. It’s also worth keeping in mind that not everyone on the team moves equally well on shared purpose alone: some people may need very explicit expectations as well.
If a style more centered on structure and clear expectations interests you, check out the organizing leader profile.
The blind spot Marshall Goldsmith identifies in this profile
Executive coach Marshall Goldsmith, in his book What Got You Here Won’t Get You There, raises an uncomfortable idea for any leader who’s gotten far thanks to their charisma: the very traits that made you stand out (strong opinions, confidence speaking, always having an answer ready) tend to turn, without you noticing, into the obstacle holding back your next step as a leader. Goldsmith describes very specific habits that tend to accompany inspirational profiles: wanting to always win the conversation, adding your own spin to every idea even when it was already good, speaking before fully listening. None of these habits seems serious on its own, but over time they signal to the team that their ideas only count once they’ve passed through the leader’s filter, exactly the opposite of what an inspirational style is trying to achieve.
The hard part, Goldsmith notes, is that accumulated success makes these blind spots harder to see: if something has worked for someone so far, it’s harder to accept that the same behavior starts working against them as their responsibility grows. As a concrete exercise, Goldsmith suggests actively asking the team what behavior of yours they’d like you to stop, not only what you should start doing, as one possible way to surface these blind spots before they take a toll.
You can go back to your full result in the What’s My Leadership Style? test.
Want to know more about yourself?
Discover your result with one of our related tests.
Frequently asked questions
Where does the concept of inspirational leadership come from?
From transformational leadership, described by James MacGregor Burns in 1978 and developed further by Bernard Bass: a style that mobilizes people through shared vision and example, more than through rules or incentives.
Is it better than organizing leadership?
It isn't better in absolute terms: it works especially well for mobilizing people and inspiring change, but it needs some structure to hold it up so the vision turns into concrete results.
Can anyone develop this style?
To a large extent, yes. Some people find it more natural, but communicating a clear purpose and leading by example are skills that can be deliberately trained.
What's the risk with this style?
That the vision stays just talk if it isn't backed by at least a minimal structure to sustain it day to day.